<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Haruki Murakami lies. Why he writes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chindu.net/reports-on-research/why-haruki-murakami-lies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chindu.net/reports-on-research/why-haruki-murakami-lies/</link>
	<description>Chindu Sreedharan reports on life, etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:44:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Pope</title>
		<link>http://www.chindu.net/reports-on-research/why-haruki-murakami-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chindu.net/?p=707#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, but I think Murakami doesn&#039;t properly articulate the nature of his craft: writing fiction is not the same as lying. Fiction is not truth or falsity. A lie is a lie because of an intention to pass the statement made as truth - a lie must involve an act of deception or. But no novelist pretends his fictional world is THE world, thus it can&#039;t be a lie. Novelists don&#039;t lie unless they claim that their stories are true.(journalists might lie though...). A fictional world is, by definition, invented: it conforms to its own rules, has its own special characteristics and parameters, even perhaps its own physical laws. Every fictional world is an alternative to this one. No one reading a novel thinks they are reading a documentary account of THE world, only an account of A world. I agree with Murakami&#039;s final paragraph, regarding his reason for writing. But in order to fulfil that aim he doesn&#039;t tell lies, he constructs alternative worlds in order to probe the one we live in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, but I think Murakami doesn&#8217;t properly articulate the nature of his craft: writing fiction is not the same as lying. Fiction is not truth or falsity. A lie is a lie because of an intention to pass the statement made as truth &#8211; a lie must involve an act of deception or. But no novelist pretends his fictional world is THE world, thus it can&#8217;t be a lie. Novelists don&#8217;t lie unless they claim that their stories are true.(journalists might lie though&#8230;). A fictional world is, by definition, invented: it conforms to its own rules, has its own special characteristics and parameters, even perhaps its own physical laws. Every fictional world is an alternative to this one. No one reading a novel thinks they are reading a documentary account of THE world, only an account of A world. I agree with Murakami&#8217;s final paragraph, regarding his reason for writing. But in order to fulfil that aim he doesn&#8217;t tell lies, he constructs alternative worlds in order to probe the one we live in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
